Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-04-22 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1993-04-22 Senate Journal Page 1657 SB 106 Senator Sharp requested that the reconsideration on CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 106(FIN) be taken up. Senator Sharp called the Senate. SB 106 CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 106(FIN) "An Act establishing the energy authority revolving fund; repealing the rural electrification revolving loan fund and the bulk fuel revolving loan fund; relating to procurements for certain transmission lines; authorizing power transmission interties between Anchorage and the Kenai Peninsula, between Healy and Fairbanks, between the Swan Lake and Tyee Lake hydroelectric projects, and between Sutton and Glennallen and approving the design and construction costs of the interties; and providing for an effective date" was before the Senate on reconsideration. 1993-04-22 Senate Journal Page 1658 SB 106 Amendment No. 7 was not offered. Senator Donley moved that CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 106(FIN) be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 8. Senator Sharp objected. The question being: "Shall the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 106(FIN) Return to Second for Specific Amendment? YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Halford, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Phillips, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 8 : Page 1 lines 1 - 2: Delete "establishing the energy authority revolving fund; repealing the rural electrification revolving loan fund and the bulk fuel revolving loan fund;" Page 1, line 7: Delete "; and providing for an effective date" Page 1, line 9: Delete "(a)" Page 2, lines 2 - 16: Delete all material. 1993-04-22 Senate Journal Page 1659 SB 106 Page 2, line 26, through page 15, line 24: Delete all material. Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 15, line 25: Delete "secs. 32 and 35" Insert "secs. 5 and 8" Page 15, line 31: Delete "secs. 32 and 35" Insert "secs. 5 and 8" Page 16, line 6: Delete "secs. 30 and 31" Insert "secs. 3 and 4" Page 16, line 11: Delete "secs. 30 and 31" Insert "secs. 3 and 4" Page 16, line 15: Delete "secs. 30 and 31" Insert "secs. 3 and 4" Page 16, line 19: Delete "sec. 35" Insert "sec. 8" Page 17, line 5: Delete "sec. 35" Insert "sec. 8" Page 17, lines 21 - 22: Delete "secs. 30, 31, 33, and 34" Insert "secs. 3, 4, 6, and 7" 1993-04-22 Senate Journal Page 1660 SB 106 Page 17, line 27: Delete all material. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 8. Senator Taylor objected. Senator Donley moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 8 be withdrawn. Without objection, it was so ordered. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 106(FIN) was automatically in third reading. Senator Sharp offered the following Letter of Intent: Letter of Intent for CSSB 106(Fin) It is the intent of the legislature that the Alaska Energy Authority expeditiously implement a plan to reduce the agency's role in providing direct services with state employees, and instead provide those services by contracting with the private sector, regional utilities, or other state agencies. It is the intent of the legislature that the board of directors of the energy authority draft a plan transferring all facilities owned by the authority, including responsibility for operations and maintenance, to utilities served by those facilities when all debts and bonds are repaid. The board of directors of the energy authority is directed to prepare and submit to the legislature by December 31, 1993 a plan that would implement the above. It is the intent of the legislature that this plan will be reflected in the fiscal year 1995 budget. 1993-04-22 Senate Journal Page 1661 SB 106 Senator Sharp moved for the adoption of the Letter of Intent. Senator Kerttula objected. The question being: "Shall the Letter of Intent be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 106(FIN) Third Reading - Reconsideration Adopt Letter of Intent YEAS: 14 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff Nays: Adams, Duncan, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo and so, the Senate Letter of Intent was adopted. Senator Adams moved that CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 106(FIN) be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 9. Senator Taylor objected. Senator Adams moved and asked unanimous consent that his motion be withdrawn. Without objection, it was so ordered. Senator Adams offered Amendment No. 9 (title amendment): Page 1, line 1, after "Act": Delete "establishing the energy authority revolving fund; repealing the rural electrification revolving loan fund and the bulk fuel revolving loan fund; relating to procurements for certain transmission lines; authorizing" Insert "relating to energy projects, programs, and funds, to administration of energy projects, programs, and funds, and to funding for energy projects and programs; relating to" Page 1, lines 6-7: Delete "and approving the design and construction costs of the interties" 1993-04-22 Senate Journal Page 1662 SB 106 Senator Adams moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 9. Senator Sharp objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 9 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 106(FIN) Amendment No. 9 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 9 failed. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 106(FIN) "An Act establishing the energy authority revolving fund; repealing the rural electrification revolving loan fund and the bulk fuel revolving loan fund; relating to procurements for certain transmission lines; authorizing power transmission interties between Anchorage and the Kenai Peninsula, between Healy and Fairbanks, between the Swan Lake and Tyee Lake hydroelectric projects, and between Sutton and Glennallen and approving the design and construction costs of the interties; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-22 Senate Journal Page 1663 SB 106 CSSB 106(FIN) Third Reading - Reconsideration Effective Date YEAS: 16 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff Nays: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Kerttula and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 106(FIN) passed the Senate on reconsideration with a Senate Letter of Intent. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 106(FIN) was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.